From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan  8 13:47:20 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C06106566B;
	Fri,  8 Jan 2010 13:47:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org)
Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F558FC18;
	Fri,  8 Jan 2010 13:47:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net
	[66.111.2.69])
	by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0D3E46B29;
	Fri,  8 Jan 2010 08:47:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (smtp.hudson-trading.com [209.249.190.9])
	by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AE6D78A026;
	Fri,  8 Jan 2010 08:47:18 -0500 (EST)
From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 08:31:11 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.2-CBSD-20091103; KDE/4.3.1; amd64; ; )
References: <20100105132921.GN86359@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
	<20100105141108.GO86359@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
	<20100105141557.G88477@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <20100105141557.G88477@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201001080831.11719.jhb@freebsd.org>
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1
	(bigwig.baldwin.cx); Fri, 08 Jan 2010 08:47:18 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx
Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, hackers@freebsd.org,
	David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>
Subject: Re: Patch to Makefile.inc1 to mention which kernel config is being
	installed
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:47:20 -0000

On Tuesday 05 January 2010 9:17:22 am Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, David Wolfskill wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 01:59:13PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> >> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, David Wolfskill wrote:
> >>
> >>> Attached patch is against head; for the above, I had patched stable/7.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> INSTKERNNAME rather than INSTALLKERNEL?
> >
> > Well, I was interested in knowing which config was being used, not so
> > much what the name of the subdirectory in /boot was going to be.
> >
> > (Default value for INSTKERNNAME is "kernel", which isn't something I
> > find useful to report.)
> 
> Woopps. Cache-corruption;-) The original one is fine then.

Or maybe 'Installing INSTALLKERNEL as INSTKERNNAME'.

-- 
John Baldwin