From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 3 14:24:41 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA14868 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 14:24:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA14783 for ; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 14:24:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA71151; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 14:23:04 -0800 (PST) To: Vladimir Kushnir cc: Wiliam Woods , FBSD_CURRENT Subject: Re: pgcc-1.1.1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 04 Jan 1999 00:13:51 +0200." Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1999 14:23:03 -0800 Message-ID: <71148.915402183@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > same some of us need fast code). Works fine. Only question: does anybody > know why Linux cross-compiled (within emulation) code runs _much_ faster? 1. Please don't cross-post to both -current and -questions, whether you originated the cross-post or not. 2. Without any details, even speculating on this question is a meaningless exercise and a waste of time. What code? Compiled how? Etc. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message