From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 06:23:52 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929C916A41A for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 06:23:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A00213C46E for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 06:23:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 1180 invoked by uid 399); 28 Aug 2007 06:23:51 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO slave.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 28 Aug 2007 06:23:51 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:23:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: martinko In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0xD5B2F0FB Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent PAM changes worth an UPDATING entry? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 06:23:52 -0000 On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, martinko wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: >> Howdy, >> >> I just rebuilt and installed my world on my 6-stable box, and ran into a >> snag. Like a lot of users I use -DNO_CLEAN in buildworld since this is a >> very slow box that I use mostly as a file/dns server. After rebooting I >> could ssh in ok (probably because I don't use PAM for sshd) but couldn't >> su, or log in at the console. >> >> After looking at the errors, I figured out that I needed to completely >> recompile stuff related to PAM. Just to be on the safe side I did libpam, >> login, su, and getty. After that I was able to log in normally from the >> console, and su from either terminal. >> >> IMO this is worth an entry in UPDATING since I probably won't be the only >> user who stumbles across this. >> >> Doug >> > > Doug, > > Could it possibly be related to the following issue of mine ?? : > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2007-July/153137.html Sure sounds that way. Have you tried doing clean recompiles of those programs? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection