From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 00:09:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB2D16A417 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 00:09:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (dsl081-163-122.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.163.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C227F13C45E for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 00:09:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from w16.stradamotorsports.com (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m180922g093482 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:09:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <47AB9DA9.8080006@highperformance.net> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:09:13 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4pre (X11/20080205) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <50460.33951.qm@web34512.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20080207151415.06393db1@meijome.net> <47AAA5F0.4090803@highperformance.net> <200802070818.45400.wundram@beenic.net> In-Reply-To: <200802070818.45400.wundram@beenic.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=failed version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Subject: Re: Some ideas for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:09:06 -0000 Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2008 07:32:16 schrieb Jason C. Wells: >> Norberto Meijome wrote: >>> But I agree with Wojciech..do you really want to use swap files? >> One could mount an md filesystem and then use that as swap. That way >> you wouldn't need to use any disc space. As a plus, the performance >> would be way better than disc. > > Ahem, sorry, that's just plain stupid. Either the md system is backed up by > RAM (in which case you don't need the swap anyway; why'd you want to access > RAM by putting it in a swap on an md in RAM?), or it's backed up by swap, in > which case you have a chicken and egg problem. Mmm, yes. That is quite a pickle. But a chicken or an egg would still be inferior to an md backed swap. :) Regards, Jason