From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 10 15:47:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 680) id 3321C16A4D0; Tue, 10 May 2005 15:47:34 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 15:47:34 +0000 From: Darren Reed To: "Christian S.J. Peron" Message-ID: <20050510154734.GD67017@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20050504131644.GA5311@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050504131644.GA5311@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: max@love2party.net cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net bpf.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 15:47:34 -0000 On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:16:44PM +0000, Christian S.J. Peron wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 10:25:54AM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > > > > You are not going to MFC the sysctl-rename, I hope? > > > > Not exactly. I do plan to MFC the new sysctl variables but > keep the old ones with a deprecation cycle of a release or so. > At which point they will be removed. > > Thoughts? This is the wrong approach for items of this nature. You should not be deprecating them, at all, on anything other than -current. Darren