From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 15:26:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2A6106566B for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:26:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=1643314351=killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700518FC0A for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:26:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=multiplay.co.uk; s=Multiplay; t=1264605958; x=1265210758; q=dns/txt; h=Received: Message-ID:From:To:Cc:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=mvO7jSI0svuYjAw0qEDyo Jb7hwzkMe5u9Ij/LGuz/i4=; b=nX8M7DYbJCNO8NJth68I0E7pq6rhTk5J2yJQI 0Nyu1J1ETkK9aH9zi/rlJ8+hKKECd6M0afDBqwQ07NGKnnlyc7LQMLB98JSjlgRQ GBW8HW14Wz+18EyDdp1RWmV5d3Wxw9BbYzQyB+pDLFab88hIiV212r7hrCSLqdkT ILUx+M= X-MDAV-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:25:58 +0000 Received: from r2d2 by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4) with ESMTP id md50009320890.msg; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:25:56 +0000 X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:25:56 +0000 (not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source) X-Authenticated-Sender: Killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDRemoteIP: 213.123.247.160 X-Return-Path: prvs=1643314351=killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk Message-ID: <251ACDBA39F244B7B8D1520DE3C95DF1@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: References: <8E2B6E11A79B4958B94B44A41C7D4298@multiplay.co.uk> <61b573981001270543k6514a5g8d4f679777b69b49@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:25:56 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems getting lagg to balance using lacp X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:26:03 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shteryana Shopova" > What types of traffic streams are you testing this with? if_lagg will > use the SRC/DST MACs and IP addresses for IP traffic to decide which > member port of the lagg to sent the traffic out to, balancing of > incoming traffic should be done by the Cisco on the same principle. > Try a different laggproto for the if_lagg interface e.g. roundrobin > with channel-group mode on set on the switchports. I was testing with iperf to and from two other machines on the network. If I tested with one machine I got 1g throughput, with 2 machines I got ~500Mbps on each, for both inbound and outbound on em1. == laggproto lacp + channel-group 2 mode active == Got the same with both inbound and outbound connection == laggproto fec + channel-group 2 mode on == Got the same with both inbound and outbound connection == laggproto loadbalance + channel-group 2 mode on == Got the same with both inbound and outbound connection == laggproto roundrobin + channel-group 2 mode on ==, Instead of 1Gbps throughput on one interface I get 500Mbps on each for outbound only still no change with inbound. Any other ideas? Regards Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.