From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 19 05:02:16 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id FAA17416 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 05:02:16 -0700 Received: from zap.zap.qc.ca (zap.zap.qc.ca [198.168.127.8]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA17410 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 05:02:10 -0700 Received: (from fortin@localhost) by zap.zap.qc.ca (8.6.9/8.6.6) id IAA05394; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 08:01:54 -0400 From: Denis Fortin Message-Id: <199504191201.IAA05394@zap.zap.qc.ca> Subject: Re: PPP and dynamic IPs drifting a little To: fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 08:01:53 -0400 (EDT) Cc: jleppek@suw2k.ess.harris.com, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, karl@mcs.net, kozowski@structured.net In-Reply-To: <95Apr18.180249pdt.49864@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> from "Bill Fenner" at Apr 18, 95 06:02:35 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 636 Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > In message <9504181741.AA05651@borg.ess.harris.com> Bill writes: > >Well, I tried to ping those to confirm they are never in use and > >I got an answer! Then I tried 192.168.1.2 and it answered!! > > > >So what is the scoop on those numbers and RFC1597? > > It looks like structured.net and net99 are advertising 192.168.1.x to the > Internet (well, MAE-EAST, at least), in violation of RFC1597. They should > stop. Ok, so who is going to send them mail to complain? -- Denis Fortin fortin@acm.org DMR Group Inc, (514) 877-3301 These opinions are my own