From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 27 10:33:00 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D7F37B401 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:33:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.a1poweruser.com (oh-chardon6a-49.clvhoh.adelphia.net [68.169.105.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA7343F3F for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:32:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from FBSD_User@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish (lanwin2 [10.0.10.6]) by smtp.a1poweruser.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F9F2F6 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:44:29 -0400 (EDT) From: "FBSD_User" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:32:55 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Subject: Stand-a-lone NAT PGM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: FBSD_User@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 17:33:01 -0000 I have been looking for NAT program which is not part of some other program like NATD is part of IPFW or IPNAT is part of IPFILTER or NAT of user ppp. I can not find any NAT program in the FBSD ports collection unless I mis-understood some description. If anybody knows of one please let me know. Yes I know that I can set firewall rule to pass all packets just to use NAT function, but I don't want overhead of firewall logic, just simple NAT like PPP NAT function with out the PPP stuff. I was wondering if the NAT logic code from user ppp could be copied and made into stand-a-lone NAT program. My programming ability is not great so I am asking for opinions on weather this is technical possible? Thanks