Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 9 Jul 2020 05:36:23 +0530
From:      Manish Jain <bourne.identity@hotmail.com>
To:        David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Are there any real advantages of ext4 over ext2 ?
Message-ID:  <DB8PR06MB64423905DAA33A6F663BD749F6640@DB8PR06MB6442.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <7e89c45e-aaae-1b42-18a5-1c45ec07b145@holgerdanske.com>
References:  <DB8PR06MB64426C4BB725C23C544C6E3AF6670@DB8PR06MB6442.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <7e89c45e-aaae-1b42-18a5-1c45ec07b145@holgerdanske.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2020-07-09 04:44, David Christensen wrote:
> I recently learned that FreeBSD supports ext2 and have formatted a USB 
> HDD with ext2 for this reason, but have yet to test it with FreeBSD.

ext2 works very well under FreeBSD. I have been using ext2fs for ages 
under FreeBSD. The support is smooth and reliable. All you need to do is 
kldload linux.

ext4 works under FreeBSD via fuse-ext2, which unfortunately is quite 
slow as on date.

ZFS, as you correctly point out, is another option that I will keep in 
mind in future.


Thanks,
Manish Jain



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DB8PR06MB64423905DAA33A6F663BD749F6640>