From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Jan  5 21:19:46 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA25368
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 21:19:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from dyson@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA25359
          Fri, 5 Jan 1996 21:19:44 -0800 (PST)
From: John Dyson <dyson>
Message-Id: <199601060519.VAA25359@freefall.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Current is looking more stable these days..?
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 21:19:44 -0800 (PST)
Cc: current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <10406.820882935@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jan 5, 96 03:02:15 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> In contravention of all reason, I've been running it on my gateway box
> lately and, as of this morning's sup, things look pretty reasonable
> (at least from the perspective of an EISA/ISA box with a 1542CF
> controller).
> 
> What do -current folk think about a 2.2-SNAP pretty soon here?  Would
> you like a grace period of a week or so to tidy up first?  Longer?
> 
> 					Jordan
>

Well, I have been cleaning up some significant performance enhancements -- but
if you are planning on "stabilizing", then I DONT WANT to break anything.
I'll hold off until the decision is made...

John