From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 29 05:19:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9BB106566C; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:19:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidxu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DAF8FC21; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:19:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidxu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from apple.my.domain (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m1T5JghM033159; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:19:43 GMT (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <47C7963B.2080509@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:20:59 +0800 From: David Xu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071211) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Roberson References: <20080220175532.Q920@desktop> <20080220213253.A920@desktop> <20080221092011.J52922@fledge.watson.org> <20080222121253.N920@desktop> <20080222231245.GA28788@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20080222134923.M920@desktop> <20080223194047.GB38485@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20080223111659.K920@desktop> <20080223213507.GD39699@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20080224001902.J920@desktop> <20080225231747.GT99258@elvis.mu.org> <20080225143222.B920@desktop> <20080225160433.P920@desktop> <20080225194320.V920@desktop> <20080225213434.L920@desktop> <20080226121251.V920@desktop> <20080226233645.D920@desktop> In-Reply-To: <20080226233645.D920@desktop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Brooks Davis , Andrew Gallatin , Alfred Perlstein , Daniel Eischen , arch@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson Subject: Re: cpuset and affinity implementation X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:19:48 -0000 Jeff Roberson wrote: > > Are there any objections to commiting this functionality in its current > form? > > I think there is the possibility for further debate and refinement but I > believe the code is stable and simple enough to hit the tree for people > to start using it. > > Thanks, > Jeff I have no objection, it can be refined later if there is any issue. Thanks, David Xu