From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug  8 00:15:43 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: arch@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2496116A41F
	for <arch@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  8 Aug 2005 00:15:43 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AE143D46
	for <arch@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  8 Aug 2005 00:15:42 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2])
	by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j780FYTC093518;
	Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <200508080015.j780FYTC093518@gw.catspoiler.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
To: phk@haven.freebsd.dk
In-Reply-To: <21744.1123267707@phk.freebsd.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: putting HESIOD, Appletalk and IPX on notice
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:15:43 -0000

On  5 Aug, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> 
> I think it is time we deorbit HESIOD in toto.

We used HESIOD maps with amd at my previous day job.  For all I know,
this is still the situation.