From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 15:51:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9ECF16A4DE; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:51:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB1743D31; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:51:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (scottl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8OFpVaH046004; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:51:31 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (scottl@localhost)i8OFpVou046001; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:51:31 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: pooker.samsco.org: scottl owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:51:31 -0600 (MDT) From: Scott Long Sender: scottl@pooker.samsco.org To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman In-Reply-To: <20040924154708.GI959@green.homeunix.org> Message-ID: <20040924094950.N39925@pooker.samsco.org> References: <200409221253.i8MCrR4K036310@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040924140756.GG959@green.homeunix.org> <20040924145126.GH959@green.homeunix.org> <20040924154708.GI959@green.homeunix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: Oliver Lehmann Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net if.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:51:19 -0000 On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > > > > This is mostly solved, and Julian is just tracking down some edge cases > > that people have reported. I'm not sure if we are going to turn on > > PREEMPTION for 5.3, though. > > Every time it "appears" to be fixed, I can't get any kind of stability > with SMP, PREEMPTION, and SCHED_ULE; I'm certainly willing to try it > each time it looks to be fixed. Would you please copy me on the reports that you've sent to Julian so I can track them also? > > > > > > * Reports of UFS2 "large disk" problems > > > > I guess you haven't been paying attention to all of the good work that > > Pawel is doing here. I also have fixes in my queue for growfs. > > Just based on observation of "what of these things look stalled," not > meant as any slight to pjd. Well, just because it doesn't happen on your IRC channel doesn't mean that it's not happening ;-) > > > > "Things not on the lists that I would love to be fixed": > > > * IPv6 route lookup recursion I've fixed already/still getting review > > > * ugen detachment crash I've fixed already/still getting review > > > * BPF panics due to bpfdetach() on live interface > > > * cbb child interrupt handler deregistration race+panic > > > * SoftUpdates panics > > > * anything from http://www.holm.cc/stress/log/ > > > > > > > Of the things are you are working on right now, how many do you think > > you'll have fixed in the next week? I'm definitely not trying to rush > > you, just curious on what you have planned. > > From this list: > > The IPv6 routing error/INVARIANTS-crash should be in shortly. > The ugen detachment requires imp's testing; since he backed > out my previous suboptimal workaround, and then unbacked it out, it is > back to not being a crash again but could (interruptibly) hang an > application using the ugen device. The bpfdetach() is something that > should be fixed after rwatson's latest bpf.c delta, but needs > testing. The cbb problem problem is fixable by adding locking or by > adding ithread pinning, but I am unable to do anything about it. Sounds good, thanks! Scott