Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 08:03:15 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Replacing Drive with SSD Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1509150753490.99919@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <997E40C8-6C07-4621-B5D8-E0672DC4517B@lafn.org> References: <CEAD84AD-341A-4FB9-A3A1-D0D5A550AFFD@lafn.org> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1508281235390.74312@wonkity.com> <20150829220311.c7608be1.freebsd@edvax.de> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1508300633160.44682@wonkity.com> <55E45973.2050103@sneakertech.com> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1508311000550.42983@wonkity.com> <55E4865B.1000104@sneakertech.com> <20150831181135.7682a810@gumby.homeunix.com> <867fnywc8i.fsf@WorkBox.Home> <08306F31-955B-4710-B20B-4F2ABE0CBA56@kraus-haus.org> <997E40C8-6C07-4621-B5D8-E0672DC4517B@lafn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, Doug Hardie wrote: > After spending a lot of time reading through the various responses, I > decided to use a larger SSD and use dump/restore to move the data. > However, I encountered an interesting problem which I do not have a > solution for at this time. The system will only boot a memstick > image. That works fine. I formatted the new SSD and got it all > setup. However, none of the current systems have enough space to do a > dump on. I needed to dump from the existing machine over to the new > one with the SSD. The only thing running on the SSD machine is the > live file system. Dump uses rsh/rcmd which need some files set in > /root. Unfortunately that is mounted as read only as its a memstick > image. I can’t see how to easily get dump to dump to a remote system > when you can’t get rsh/rcmd to login. The live filesystem from an installer will work, although mfsBSD is nicer. Pipe the output from dump into an ssh session on the remote machine that runs restore. Leaving out most of the options for clarity: dump -f - | ssh user@remote 'cd /target && restore -rf -' If a dump file is desired, it can be created on the SSD filesystem: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/backup.html#_code_dump_code_via_ssh That file can be restored directly on that system. Since the SSD has essentially zero access time, it does not hurt like restoring a dumpfile on the same drive. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Sep 15 14:08:24 2015 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B8EA048AD for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:08:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DD181423 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id t8FE7w8O017024 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:07:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id t8FE7wAA017021; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:07:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:07:58 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no> Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: kpneal@pobox.com cc: Olivier Nicole <Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem starting named in FreeBSD 10.2 In-Reply-To: <20150915134019.GB23168@neutralgood.org> Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1509151555550.25579@mail.fig.ol.no> References: <wu7fv2gnhis.fsf@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <20150915134019.GB23168@neutralgood.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1509151559420.25579@mail.fig.ol.no> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.fig.ol.no Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:08:24 -0000 On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:40-0400, kpneal@pobox.com wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 04:44:43PM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am having problems starting named in FreeBSD 10.2. I have been using > > the exact same rc.d/named script for years, it is still working in FreeBSD 10.1 > > > > The rc.d/named script contains a REQUIRE line that is not honnorred: > > > > # REQUIRE: NETWORKING ldconfig syslogd > > Is it possible there is a loop in the dependencies somewhere? I can imagine > breaking a loop by ignoring a REQUIRE line somewhere. Try running (sh syntax): rcorder /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/* 2>&1 | less On one of my DNS servers, I see these lines: /etc/rc.d/ipfw /etc/rc.d/NETWORKING <-- /etc/rc.d/netwait /etc/rc.d/mountcritremote /etc/rc.d/accounting /etc/rc.d/ldconfig <-- /etc/rc.d/newsyslog /etc/rc.d/syslogd <-- /etc/rc.d/ntpdate /etc/rc.d/rpcbind /etc/rc.d/nfsclient /etc/rc.d/devfs /etc/rc.d/ipmon /etc/rc.d/mdconfig2 /usr/local/etc/rc.d/named <-- /etc/rc.d/kdc If libxml2.so.2 is missing from /usr/local/lib, then check to see if files named libxml2.so.2.* exists in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/. In a pinch you might be able to move on by running something like this: ln -s libxml2.so.2.9.2 /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libxml2.so.2 Substitute libxml2.so.2.9.2 with the newest file as found in your /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg directory. In my case, I can choose between libxml2.so.2.9.1 and libxml2.so.2.9.2. Next, I would probably reinstall/forcefully upgrade textproc/libxml2. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Sep 15 14:10:45 2015 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA14A04B03 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:10:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eriklauritsen@yandex.com) Received: from forward12p.cmail.yandex.net (forward12p.cmail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1465::ba]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF2AC1611 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:10:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eriklauritsen@yandex.com) Received: from web2g.yandex.ru (web2g.yandex.ru [95.108.252.102]) by forward12p.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 8314D209D5 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:10:32 +0300 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web2g.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 236D44862165; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:10:32 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1442326232; bh=3HUnCScHtby3cXzvTEwl1jIe6eB38PQtalu7uUByka4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=vr7F3vTiqCoR60J1S18SwrzvjwwO2lSVwu3K704n+yZvPR1XZCSq287XVNM9r2r7n KTulcxR+mdYvMq+doTWdh7rCg6aptfyxktEVq3snpNKM3pUT8tf9NJalBdNVwinsRx PCYcYQPZN262dnBwzz9uk5xrt6fO6fWXl2Zq79Pc= Received: by web2g.yandex.ru with HTTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:10:31 +0300 From: Erik Lauritsen <eriklauritsen@yandex.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Poor support for graphic cards MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <413321442326231@web2g.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:10:31 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:10:45 -0000 Hi Why does FreeBSD has such poor support for graphic cards? I would never consider using a Nvidia card with a closed source driver so I need something other than Nvidia. I have looked at the wiki for supported cards and the list is very small. Is that because people are simple recommended using Nvidia cards with their closed binary driver so it is not considered "that important", or is it because of a lack of developers or something else? It makes it almost impossible to run FreeBSD on a desktop with video watching capabilities. Kind regards
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.20.1509150753490.99919>