From owner-cvs-all Mon Apr 9 2:12:18 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from ipcard.iptcom.net (ipcard.iptcom.net [212.9.224.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82DC37B422; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 02:12:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from vic.sabbo.net (dialup14-24.iptelecom.net.ua [212.9.229.88]) by ipcard.iptcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA16166; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 12:11:52 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vic.sabbo.net (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f399B9t85595; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 12:11:10 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <3AD17CBB.4598E8B@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 12:11:23 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: uk,ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David E. O'Brien" Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/rsync/files ssh-patch-main.c ssh-patch-rsync.h References: <200104081548.f38FmTf80209@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "David E. O'Brien" wrote: > obrien 2001/04/08 08:48:29 PDT > > Modified files: > net/rsync/files ssh-patch-rsync.h > Added files: > net/rsync/files ssh-patch-main.c > Log: Isn't patchfile should begin with "patch-" prefix? What is the reason here for breaking good (and very reasonable, IMO) convention for patchnames? -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message