From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Jun 2 20:29:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2186B66FBF for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 20:29:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hiren@strugglingcoder.info) Received: from mail.strugglingcoder.info (strugglingcoder.info [104.236.146.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E464C1DD9 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 20:29:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hiren@strugglingcoder.info) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.1.1.3]) (Authenticated sender: hiren@strugglingcoder.info) by mail.strugglingcoder.info (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A9B411773C; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 13:29:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 13:29:22 -0700 From: hiren panchasara To: Grzegorz Junka Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blank Emails (example: D6689: tcp/lro: Implement hash table for LRO entries.) Message-ID: <20160602202922.GH8994@strugglingcoder.info> References: <45f42bda-b727-bbc3-bf87-e3c7ef85cd4f@gjunka.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+QwZB9vYiNIzNXIj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45f42bda-b727-bbc3-bf87-e3c7ef85cd4f@gjunka.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 20:29:24 -0000 --+QwZB9vYiNIzNXIj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/02/16 at 08:25P, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > I am. I am also new here so I thought they are expected. >=20 > Grzegorz >=20 >=20 > On 02/06/2016 16:45, David DeSimone wrote: > > I keep receiving blank emails like this one. > > > > Is everyone else? > > > > Is there something wrong with the bug tracking system? I believe its the phabricator (review system) that does it. I'll let the admins know. Cheers, Hiren --+QwZB9vYiNIzNXIj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQF8BAABCgBmBQJXUJciXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBNEUyMEZBMUQ4Nzg4RjNGMTdFNjZGMDI4 QjkyNTBFMTU2M0VERkU1AAoJEIuSUOFWPt/l/EgIAIPbJqH1a4w2aLYIDQ/OoQnY /sBSCgP5QIf9mK0MW64KrWpfMCZTdHHabDOIsaGPv69qrtfvxztUTk+59FsoQuee VisDvDqkt/XFe6sfjk0wdZezb9AIUKQlbj03Rs6/2NaWKwgIK0sSZXMNTVxacV5N +2d6Z2saYidun1Ek61Qwu+EMEN71FoaldBV7TZf3nB+ntDMGTAGdCOYJg0NMYtxf 6Q1AX71I62+kV5srH5QJrruf/GAw7lTeC7Y3p3VrXTxI08QFvckOsj3aYN9dVH8i SVOzzWPk0HCVYnz+pAwE0aE7y23mE38WquCdTldpnmRX//tjbZh7lqTlPsYhsX0= =Fx/Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+QwZB9vYiNIzNXIj--