From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Mar 23 21:47:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtppop3.gte.net (smtppop3.gte.net [207.115.153.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D7FB37B6A2 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:47:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from harold.j.scott@gte.net) Received: from nipomo (1Cust173.tnt41.lax3.da.uu.net [63.30.228.173]) by smtppop3.gte.net with SMTP for ; id XAA4702888 Thu, 23 Mar 2000 23:47:03 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000323214621.007b65e0@mail.gte.net> X-Sender: web108mt@mail.gte.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:46:21 -0800 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Harold Scott Subject: need help with CTM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG wanted to bring system installed from 3.4 cdrom up to date obtained latest ctm files and invoked ctm did make world and seemed ok made generic kernel and seemed ok real reason for update is so that I could have the latest picobsd stuff. made and installed kernel with vn stuff (required for pico build) and that kernel seemed ok when I got ready to build picobsd, found that many of the scripts did not have the execute permission set. set permissions manually and tried to build pico but then it complained that some of the .o files were not where they should be. search archive for help why ctm did not preserve the permissions and found 1997 article that said thats the way it is. is it really this flakey ? the source files for pico built with original source from cdrom. but does anyone have an answer why the ctm source did not build. by the way I mirrored the picobsd sources from freebsd.org over the 3.4 cdrom source tree and that built properly. I thought ctm was a reliable way to be up to date. whats wrong ? thanks scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message