From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Wed Oct 4 10:35:25 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68BBE35580 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:35:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "land.berklix.org", Issuer "land.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5502C7FAE0 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:35:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FA3C56.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.250.60.86]) (authenticated bits=0) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v94AYTKt055444 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:34:34 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id v94AZGbQ078960 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 12:35:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id v94AZ4JM095529 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2017 12:35:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201710041035.v94AZ4JM095529@fire.js.berklix.net> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rtools were deemed almost unused 15 years ago... From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Tue, 03 Oct 2017 23:04:38 -0000." <20171003230438.GA53445@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 12:35:03 +0200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 10:35:25 -0000 > Have you picked up the recent changes to the code in your port? > > ----- Jeremie Le Hen's Original Message ----- > > I've slacked a bit but here we are: > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12573 > >=20 > > On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Jeremie Le Hen wrot= > e: > > >> So the first step was to create a port with FreeBSD rcmds, here we > > >> are! But I need some eyes to vet it: > > >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D11345 > > > > > > The port has been submitted and RCMDS are disabled by default from the > > > base system. > > > > > > See you in a month for the removal! NO ! It's maddening, code vandals periodicaly wanting to delete working code & pontificating what others globaly should be denied, & forced to do & not do. One example why FreeBSD should not delete rlogin & telnet etc 3 days ago, a host with broken sshd (bad shared libs version number), was rescued by ssh to trusted parent host, then rlogin from that parent host to underlying jail. 3rd party code vandals are Not fit to decide what code should be denied globaly in other peoples' environments. By all means leave off by default in /etc/inetd.conf as now, but do Not Vandal Delete ! BSD is not Microsoft replete with masses of clueless users. BSD includes skilled users who may wish to make their own risk assessments, without interference. Cheers, Julian -- Julian H. Stacey, Computer Consultant, BSD Linux Unix Systems Engineer, Munich Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable. http://berklix.eu/brexit/ UK stole 3,500,000 votes; 700,000 from Brits in EU.