Date: Wed, 23 Apr 1997 13:02:51 +0100 (BST) From: Stephen Roome <steve@visint.co.uk> To: Steve Passe <smp@csn.net> Cc: "Eric L. Hernes" <erich@lodgenet.com>, smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hardware list Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970423125904.9016B-100000@bagpuss.visint.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <199704222029.OAA18733@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 22 Apr 1997, Steve Passe wrote: > Hi, > > > >Comments: > > > > This board is pretty old, but seems ok. The post lite2 works the > > best I've seen on it. > > I'm not sure of exact numbers, since it varies on a loaded system, but it > seems like the latest src with the vm changes has shaved 6-7 seconds > off my kernel compile times. What sort of kernel compile times should be expected, with my last compile make -j8 it took 3 minutes and 48 seconds for a Generic kernel with the sysv stuff for X, and none of the drivers I'm not using. (i.e. one net card a 2940 and 2 processors, nothing much else but 1 com port for a mouse) and make -j16 took 3 minutes 19 seconds on the same kernel. (both booted from this stripped down minimal kernel) So, are these good times then ? (the source was supped down on saturday ontop of a 3.0-970209-SNAP) -- Steve Roome Technical Systems Manager, Vision Interactive Ltd. E: steve@visint.co.uk M: +44 (0) 976 241 342 T: +44 (0) 117 973 0597 F: +44 (0) 117 923 8522
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970423125904.9016B-100000>