From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 9 16:37:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02FF106566B; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 16:37:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429B715119C; Sun, 9 Oct 2011 16:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E91CDB1.3070304@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 09:37:05 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111001 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Fonvieille References: <20111007141312.GJ26743@acme.spoerlein.net> <4E8F0AA2.3020704@freebsd.org> <4E8F8873.4030006@FreeBSD.org> <20111008090351.GA1960@emphyrio.blackend.org> <4E91A867.9060905@FreeBSD.org> <20111009153343.GC2006@emphyrio.blackend.org> In-Reply-To: <20111009153343.GC2006@emphyrio.blackend.org> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org, doceng@FreeBSD.org, Gavin Atkinson , Gabor Kovesdan , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?n?= , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ulrich_Sp=F6rlei?=, Rene Ladan Subject: Re: Conversion to SVN X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 16:37:06 -0000 On 10/09/2011 08:33, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:57:59PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >> On 2011.10.08. 11:03, Marc Fonvieille wrote: >>> And before doing the change, some things should >>> be done: complete separation between release docs and doc/ >> Or maybe complete integration? Once we are in SVN we can branch release >> docs even if we do not branch the rest to make it easy for translators. >> What do you think? >> > > It's obvious that your point of view can also be defended, but the aim > from src point of view is to be able to build a release without the need > of a doc tree. If there isn't already a knob to avoid building the docs in the new release building system (like there was in the old one) then there certainly should be. Meanwhile, one of the virtues of having doc and src in the same svn repo is the ability to have one canonical version of the documentation. -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/