From owner-svn-src-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 9 16:37:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-projects@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC0810656D3; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:37:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@freebsd.org) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [69.12.149.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CDF68FC21; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:37:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@freebsd.org) Received: from trouble.errno.com (trouble.errno.com [10.0.0.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.13.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id n29GbMNm018289 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:37:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <49B545C2.7030500@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:37:22 -0700 From: Sam Leffler Organization: FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luigi Rizzo References: <200903081629.n28GTxBH087773@svn.freebsd.org> <20090308164708.GA97383@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090309143331.GA57289@what-creek.com> <20090309150746.GB36472@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <20090309150746.GB36472@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC-x.dcc-servers-Metrics: ebb.errno.com; whitelist Cc: svn-src-projects@freebsd.org, John Birrell , src-committers@freebsd.org, John Birrell Subject: Re: svn commit: r189537 - projects/jbuild/usr.sbin/config X-BeenThere: svn-src-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the src " projects" tree" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:37:25 -0000 Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:33:31PM +0000, John Birrell wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 05:47:08PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: >> >>> maybe a naive question, but isn't there a way to construct >>> these Buildfile's (and Buildfile.dirdep, assuming they are >>> not there by mistake) automatically from the existing Makefiles ? >>> >> In the simple cases, the Makefile to Buildfile conversion is >> straight forward. However there are enough "special" cases where >> the files have to be cleaned up. >> >> >>> It's going to be a nightmare to support both Makefile >>> and Buildfile. >>> >> I'm not sure this is true. The Buildfiles aren't intended to be >> merged back to head -- they will stay in the project branch. >> > > ok, i thought this was not just a private project but something > that might end up in the main tree ? Sorry if i misunderstood. > > My understanding is that work under projects/ is meant to be merged to HEAD while stuff under users/ is not. At least that was the distinction given to me when I waffled about where to put my work. Sam