From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Feb 4 15:59:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from stumpy.dannyland.org (stumpy.dannyland.org [209.157.133.194]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4E640F9 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 15:59:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by stumpy.dannyland.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A48603D81; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 16:00:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 16:00:06 -0800 From: dannyman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: will 4.0-RELEASE be STABLE? Message-ID: <20000204160006.B10078@stumpy.dannyland.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i X-Loop: djhoward@uiuc.edu X-URL: http://www.dannyland.org/~dannyman/ Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG i remember once a wizened senior admin telling me that the 3.0-RELEASE wasn't going to be STABLE, that .0 RELEASE is like an interim RELEASE and that it takes up the STABLE flag at .1 or something. was this wizened senior admin a crack smoker citing some ancient, obsoleted wisdom, or would it behove me to stick with 3.x for the initial 4.0-RELEASE? is this in a FAQ somewhere? thanks. -d -- come.to/dannyman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message