From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Sep 22 05:19:17 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id FAA22478
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 22 Sep 1996 05:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.252])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA22451;
          Sun, 22 Sep 1996 05:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA01259; Sun, 22 Sep 1996 09:02:41 +0200 (MET DST)
To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Kernel sizes 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 21 Sep 1996 12:20:11 MDT."
             <199609211820.MAA12668@rover.village.org> 
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 1996 09:02:40 +0200
Message-ID: <1257.843375760@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199609211820.MAA12668@rover.village.org>, Warner Losh writes:
>Something must be very very wrong.  My new kernel is 30k smaller than
>my old (1month old) kernel. :-)
>
>A 30k reduction in size isn't supposed to happen.

Yes, it is!  If we could implement the entire FreeBSD kernel in one byte
we would! :-)

You probably missed the fact that userconfig went optional.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.