From owner-freebsd-net Sun Jun 10 20:11:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from tp.databus.com (p101-46.acedsl.com [160.79.101.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DCB737B408; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 20:11:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from barney@tp.databus.com) Received: (from barney@localhost) by tp.databus.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f5B3BTj86604; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:11:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from barney) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:11:29 -0400 From: Barney Wolff To: Mike Silbersack Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New TCP sequence number generation algorithm; review needed Message-ID: <20010610231129.A86387@tp.databus.com> References: <20010608005234.W92206-200000@achilles.silby.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010608005234.W92206-200000@achilles.silby.com>; from silby@silby.com on Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 12:56:16AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org 1. It is a misnomer to refer to "shared secret" in RFC 1948. The secret is not shared with any entity. 2. Implying that because DES can be brute-forced that MD5 can be brute-forced is just silly. Yes, in another 100 years, if Moore's Law continues to hold, which is unlikely. Suggestion - write an internet-draft and get the end2end group to endorse your scheme, rather than commiting FreeBSD to it. Barney Wolff To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message