From owner-cvs-all Mon Jul 12 14: 6:43 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from hooked.net (pm3-12.ppp.wenet.net [206.15.85.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1217315253; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:06:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Received: from localhost (garbanzo@localhost) by zippy.dyn.ml.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA01646; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 15:52:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) X-Authentication-Warning: zippy.dyn.ml.org: garbanzo owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 15:52:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex Zepeda To: Nik Clayton Cc: Marcel Moolenaar , obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, Sheldon Hearn , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/linux-base-5.2 - Imported sources In-Reply-To: <19990711221226.A32601@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Sun, 11 Jul 1999, Nik Clayton wrote: > FreeBSD is a "better Linux than Linux", not a "better Linux than Redhat". > Are there any circumstances where a (for example) Debian binary might not > run with Redhat libs installed (or a SuSE binary, or a Caldera binary, > or whatever)? Sure, and I can think of two reasons off the top of my head: * If it depends on libraries compiled with a specific compiler or a certian libc * If it depends on a specific file system layout (this is the only thing that might be distribution dependant). - alex I thought felt your touch In my car, on my clutch But I guess it's just someone who felt a lot like I remember you. - Translator To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message