From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 13 05:15:46 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730D716A417 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 05:15:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.77]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA3D13C457 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 05:15:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from atlantis.dyndns.org (athedsl-163654.home.otenet.gr [85.75.182.228]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l9D5FfvJ031483; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 08:15:43 +0300 Message-ID: <4710547D.5080102@otenet.gr> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 08:15:41 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vinny References: <47103B95.7010606@palaceofretention.ca> In-Reply-To: <47103B95.7010606@palaceofretention.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: freebsd-update port uname/internal patch level mismatch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 05:15:46 -0000 Vinny wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that using freebsd-update on a freshly installed > 6.2-RELEASE system yielded the following mismatch: > > $ uname -vp > FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p4 #0: Thu Apr 26 17:55:55 UTC 2007 > root@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 > > The results of running a freebsd-update fetch give: > > zcnew# freebsd-update fetch > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 1 mirrors found. > Fetching metadata signature from update1.FreeBSD.org... done. > Fetching metadata index... done. > Inspecting system... done. > Preparing to download files... done. > > No updates needed to update system to 6.2-RELEASE-p8. > > So uname says -p4 and freebsd-update says -p8 > > I know -p8 is correct. The kernel was last patched in -p4 so > maybe the uname information isn't updated if the kernel > isn't updated...? > Exactly. But if you are willing to rebuild the kernel yourself (this is not a difficult process) you will get -p8 in uname too. > If there is something I'm doing wrong, please let me know. > > Thank you. > > Vinny Manolis