From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 8 13:22:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13FE61065673 for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2008 13:22:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za) Received: from hermes.hst.org.za (onix.hst.org.za [209.203.2.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3748FC18 for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2008 13:22:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za) Received: from [10.1.11.1] ([10.1.11.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by hermes.hst.org.za (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mA8DC5GG080850 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2008 15:12:06 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za) From: Jonathan McKeown To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 15:25:12 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20081107031744.GA7088@shepherd> <20081107232800.GB5725@kokopelli.hydra> <20081108065558.060024b3@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20081108065558.060024b3@scorpio> X-Face: $@VrUx^RHy/}yu]jKf/<4T%/d|F+$j-Ol2"2J$q+%OK1]&/G_S9(=?iso-8859-15?q?HkaQ*=60!=3FYOK=3FY!=27M=60C=0A=09aP=5C9nVPF8Q=7DCilHH8l?= =?iso-8859-15?q?=3B=7E!42HK6=273lg4J=7Daz?=@1Dqqh:J]M^"YPn*2IWrZON$1+G?oX3@ =?iso-8859-15?q?k=230=0A=0954XDRg=3DYn=5FF-etwot4U=24b?=dTS{i X-Spam-Score: -4.399 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 209.203.2.133 Subject: Re: recommendation word processer for xfce X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2008 13:22:23 -0000 On Saturday 08 November 2008 13:55, Jerry wrote: > On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:28:00 -0700 > > Chad Perrin wrote: > >. . . or, as someone else pointed out, one could just learn to scroll > >to the end before typing. It's not that difficult -- even in Outlook. > > works like a charm also. It is amazing what people will > bitch at. The same people who will spend days attempting to get a video > card fully functional will find placing the cursor at the end of an > email message too daunting of a task. The best response to the issue of Outlook and top-posting I've seen recently was on the London Perlmongers mailing list - although I should warn that some may find this offensive. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... "The last I checked, cursor keys worked in Outlook just fine without any third-party hacks, so there is no reason for top-posting just because the cursor happens to be there. It's a bit like crapping in your pants because that's where your arse happens to be." -- Peter Corlett, london.pm Jonathan