Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 15:10:35 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Jason Unovitch <jason.unovitch@gmail.com> Cc: Jason Unovitch <junovitch@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r393282 - head/lang/chicken Message-ID: <20150802151035.GA72189@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <55BE267C.8010508@gmail.com> References: <201507310018.t6V0IniB009882@repo.freebsd.org> <20150731065008.GA75492@FreeBSD.org> <55BE267C.8010508@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 10:17:32AM -0400, Jason Unovitch wrote: > On 07/31/2015 02:50, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:18:49AM +0000, Jason Unovitch wrote: > >> New Revision: 393282 > >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/393282 > >> > >> Log: > >> Security update to Chicken 4.10.0 RC4 > >> [...] > >> > >> PORTNAME= chicken > >> -PORTVERSION= 4.10.0.r1 > >> +PORTVERSION= 4.10.0.r4 > >> PORTEPOCH= 1 > >> CATEGORIES= lang scheme > >> -MASTER_SITES= http://code.call-cc.org/dev-snapshots/2015/06/07/ > >> -DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION:.r1=rc1} > >> +MASTER_SITES= http://code.call-cc.org/dev-snapshots/2015/07/24/ > >> +DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION:.r4=rc4} > > > > Yuck. Any reason not to use DISTVERSION rather than PORTVERSION + dances? > > No, there's no reason to not use DISTVERSION. I made a mention to it to > the maintainer in https://bugs.FreeBSD.org/200980 and I'll keep the > feedback in mind for next time myself as well. In the near term when > 4.10.0 is finally released we can snip off the .r4 and remove the > DISTNAME dance. Awesome, thanks! ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150802151035.GA72189>