From owner-freebsd-security Thu May 28 16:26:20 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA22654 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Thu, 28 May 1998 16:26:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from adk.gr (COREDUMP.CIS.UPENN.EDU [158.130.6.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA22634 for ; Thu, 28 May 1998 16:26:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from angelos@dsl.cis.upenn.edu) Received: from dsl.cis.upenn.edu ([198.223.41.41]) by adk.gr (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA19747; Thu, 28 May 1998 19:25:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199805282325.TAA19747@adk.gr> To: Mike Smith , Atipa Subject: Re: SKIP problems Cc: Open Systems Networking , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 19:20:32 EDT From: "Angelos D. Keromytis" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- To: Mike Smith , Atipa Subject: Re: SKIP problems Cc: Open Systems Networking , Date: 05/28/98, 19:20:27 > At the risk of asking an obvious question - how is IPsec currently > implemented in FreeBSD? SKIP is something that can be used now - it may > not be the best solution, but it is something that can be implemented > today. That was the topic of the discussion. I think it's fairly easy to port the OpenBSD IPsec, and there's the WIDE implementation (I'm told). - -Angelos -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface iQCVAwUBNW3xP70pBjh2h1kFAQHqfgP/SKW9TWXETXcr+ADEBFFHQbO5DhuMArj8 3oWbRdEIhG9XjI0rMmG/YV8DD+DiTnXWzRc7iWbfeeX4zx0pWJBgA2zymMugVgRl kcoU8NvOxOYgW5k+RLWD3wSLQaRzvMabiSZcmwbM+/TLGndyEhYRLyZgVmhMLTB5 AxQX9N9zdq8= =yX0U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message