Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 13:07:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-standards@bostonradio.org Subject: Re: time_t definition is wrong Message-ID: <200106022007.f52K76S04853@earth.backplane.com> References: <200106012318.f51NI8w38590@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <200106020823.f528N5O98998@earth.backplane.com> <20010602085237.A73968@dragon.nuxi.com> <200106021739.f52Hd9V03943@earth.backplane.com> <p05100e0fb73ee9d458f7@[128.113.24.47]> <20010602124907.G31257@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:
:On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 03:33:03PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
:>
:> I don't have any strong feeling about what is "right" in this
:> case, but I do think it would be appropriate to back out the
:> change to time_t until the question *is* correctly sorted out.
:
:I don't see why? We can't even agree there is a problem. And if dangous
:kernel commits can stay in, so can this one.
:
:--
:-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
This is no justification for your commit, Dave. By that reasoning you
could justify everything under the sun simply by saying that someone,
somewhere else, at some time in the past, did something that was more
dangerous. Give me a break.
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200106022007.f52K76S04853>