From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr  3 21:57:16 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A987106566B;
	Tue,  3 Apr 2012 21:57:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de)
Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2258FC15;
	Tue,  3 Apr 2012 21:57:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id
	q33LvEfS051878; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 23:57:14 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de)
Received: (from marius@localhost)
	by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q33LvEFJ051877;
	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 23:57:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius)
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 23:57:14 +0200
From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
To: "McConnell, Stephen" <Stephen.McConnell@lsi.com>
Message-ID: <20120403215714.GO93449@alchemy.franken.de>
References: <CA+qFSQ6nHXidbD2z+95E9a+qkMVyg4TU4Hac+G0qBU197-K5QQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120403082927.GH93449@alchemy.franken.de>
	<20120403122858.GA48373@alchemy.franken.de>
	<B2FD678A64EAAD45B089B123FDFC3ED72B96EF8E14@inbmail01.lsi.com>
	<A5E537D8E1B0EF499D49E9AE3E3458FE012DC44A6D@cosmail03.lsi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A5E537D8E1B0EF499D49E9AE3E3458FE012DC44A6D@cosmail03.lsi.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer@freebsd.org>,
	"stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org>, "zvqops@di.vc" <zvqops@di.vc>,
	"ken@freebsd.org" <ken@freebsd.org>, "Desai,
	Kashyap" <Kashyap.Desai@lsi.com>
Subject: Re: r232411 breaks onboard 1068 detection
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 21:57:16 -0000

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:52:14PM -0600, McConnell, Stephen wrote:
> Marius,
> 
> Since the 0x59 device is a MegaRAID device, shouldn't you be using the MegaRAID driver.  Why is the MPT driver being used in this case?  The problem is that the MPT driver was wrongly attaching to some MegaRAID controllers and that was causing conflict problems, so that was fixed by removing MegaRAID ID's from the MPT driver.
> 

Apparently, the 0x59 devices worked just fine using mpt(4) before r232411.
Are MegaRAID devices backwards-compatible so they can alternatively be
driven by MPT drivers?

Marius