Date: Sat, 30 Aug 1997 21:44:49 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Steve Passe <smp@csn.net> Cc: smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: another set of changes. Message-ID: <7453.872970289@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 30 Aug 1997 13:32:07 MDT." <199708301932.NAA16780@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199708301932.NAA16780@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com>, Steve Passe writes: >> Well, I was thinking more about making it a counting semaphore in that >> case and printf a warning if the count was unexpected. >> >> I know for almost for sure that it will trigger in the vfs/vnode stuff > ^^^^ >> because of nested calls. > >could you elaborate? Do you mean you expect my current disable_intr() >stuff to recursively lock? I have run it for about 13 hours now, including >a complete buildworld without problem. No, but I am pretty sure there are nested simple_lock() calls in the vnode code. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7453.872970289>