Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 14:54:38 -0500 From: Noah Dunker <ndunker@jccc.net> To: 'Peter Warrick' <peter@guest-teik.com>, Fernando Gleiser <fgleiser@cactus.fi.uba.ar> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Redhat Linux Route command translated to FreeBSD? Message-ID: <C18E28011272D41180AD00B0D0496C0801C021E8@ns-exch05>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C11543.A3168A00
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
try using:
netstat -r
or
netstat -rn
pipe through less or more if it's too long.
Noah Dunker
Systems Analyst/Technician
Johnson County Community College
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Warrick [mailto:peter@guest-teik.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 2:54 PM
To: Fernando Gleiser
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Redhat Linux Route command translated to FreeBSD?
This I have tried. The problem is that it then specifies the gateway of
1.2.3.4 as the MAC address of xl0. I am not sure if this is correct but it
still doesn't work for my purposes.. Here's an example of what the ifconfig
and route table looks like in redhat.
ifconfig
eth1:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:EC:F1:EB
inet addr:1.2.3.1 Bcast:1.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
route
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
1.2.3.4 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth1
Now in FreeBSD...
ifconfig -au
en1: flags=8963<UP,BROADCAST,b6,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 1.2.3.1 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 1.2.3.1
ether 00:00:c5:53:07:ac
media: autoselect (100baseTX) status: active
supported media: 10baseT/UTP 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 100baseTX
<full-duplex> autoselect autoselect 10baseT/UTP
netstat -nr
Routing tables
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
1.2.3.1/32 link#4 UC 0 0 en1
1.2.3.4 0:0:c5:53:7:ac UHLS 0 0 en1
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 22 9587562 lo0
I have gotten rid of all the other extraneous IPs of my network but that is
all the necessary info I can provide...
In the Linux Redhat network 1.2.3.4 and 1.2.3.1 can now communicate with
each other. In the FreeBSD network they don't seem to want to talk.. Even
though I see the traffic on the network of a ping there is no response. I
see arp requests and also replys so from a MAC address level they know where
each other are.
The other thing that is interesting is that when I bring on an entire subnet
and once the arp calls start happening I see the IP's of machines on that
network with their respective MAC addresses in the routing table of the
server. But when I add the host to the routing table it puts in the MAC
address of the NIC in the server for the Gateway. I'm curious if this is the
problem? I am thinking I need to say that 1.2.3.4 is at a specific MAC
address or something in the routing table?
I hope this makes some sense..
Thanks again for any help.
Pete
On Tuesday, July 24, 2001, at 05:15 PM, Fernando Gleiser wrote:
Let's say the interface's name is xl0 in FreeBSD, then you say
route add -host 1.2.3.4 -interface xl0
Or, man route for more details. =0)
Fer
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Peter Warrick wrote:
Anyone have any idea what the direct translation of this redhat command
would be to BSD??
route add -host 1.2.3.4 dev eth1:0
eth1:0 is an alias on the eth1 network. eth1:0's IP is 1.2.3.1. What
that command does is say that 1.2.3.4 is directly connected to the
eth1:0 network. This means that it is routing this 1.2.3.4 IP to
1.2.3.1. Even though these addresses seem to be on the same subnet. They
actually aren't in my configuration.
Thanks for any help.. I've been stuck on getting this to work on my BSD
box for about a month now. :(
Pete
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
------_=_NextPart_001_01C11543.A3168A00
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<TITLE></TITLE>
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=111240320-25072001>try
using:</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=111240320-25072001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=111240320-25072001>netstat -r</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=111240320-25072001>or</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=111240320-25072001>netstat -rn</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=111240320-25072001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=111240320-25072001>pipe
through less or more if it's too long.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=111240320-25072001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=111240320-25072001>
<P><FONT size=2>Noah Dunker<BR>Systems Analyst/Technician<BR>Johnson County
Community College </FONT></P></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Peter Warrick
[mailto:peter@guest-teik.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 25, 2001 2:54
PM<BR><B>To:</B> Fernando Gleiser<BR><B>Cc:</B>
freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: Redhat Linux Route
command translated to FreeBSD?<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<P>This I have tried. The problem is that it then specifies the gateway of
1.2.3.4 as the MAC address of xl0. I am not sure if this is correct but it
still doesn't work for my purposes.. Here's an example of what the ifconfig
and route table looks like in redhat. </P><BR>
<P>ifconfig </P><BR>
<P><FONT face=VT100>eth1:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:EC:F1:EB
</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=VT100>inet addr:1.2.3.1 Bcast:1.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.255
</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=VT100>UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1</FONT>
</P><BR>
<P>route </P><BR>
<P><FONT face=VT100>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=VT100>1.2.3.4 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth1</FONT> </P><BR>
<P>Now in FreeBSD... </P><BR>
<P>ifconfig -au </P><BR>
<P>en1: flags=8963<UP,BROADCAST,b6,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST>
mtu 1500 </P>
<P>inet 1.2.3.1 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 1.2.3.1 </P>
<P>ether 00:00:c5:53:07:ac </P>
<P>media: autoselect (100baseTX) status: active </P>
<P>supported media: 10baseT/UTP 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex>
100baseTX <full-duplex> autoselect autoselect 10baseT/UTP </P><BR>
<P>netstat -nr </P><BR>
<P><FONT face=VT100>Routing tables </FONT></P><BR>
<P><FONT face=VT100>Internet: </FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=VT100>Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=VT100>1.2.3.1/32 link#4 UC 0 0 en1 </FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=VT100>1.2.3.4 0:0:c5:53:7:ac UHLS 0 0 en1 </FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=VT100>127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 22 9587562 lo0 </FONT></P><BR>
<P>I have gotten rid of all the other extraneous IPs of my network but that is
all the necessary info I can provide... </P><BR>
<P>In the Linux Redhat network 1.2.3.4 and 1.2.3.1 can now communicate with
each other. In the FreeBSD network they don't seem to want to talk.. Even
though I see the traffic on the network of a ping there is no response. I see
arp requests and also replys so from a MAC address level they know where each
other are. </P><BR>
<P>The other thing that is interesting is that when I bring on an entire
subnet and once the arp calls start happening I see the IP's of machines on
that network with their respective MAC addresses in the routing table of the
server. But when I add the host to the routing table it puts in the MAC
address of the NIC in the server for the Gateway. I'm curious if this is the
problem? I am thinking I need to say that 1.2.3.4 is at a specific MAC address
or something in the routing table? </P><BR>
<P>I hope this makes some sense.. </P><BR>
<P>Thanks again for any help. </P><BR>
<P>Pete </P><BR>
<P>On Tuesday, July 24, 2001, at 05:15 PM, Fernando Gleiser wrote: </P><BR>
<P>Let's say the interface's name is xl0 in FreeBSD, then you say </P><BR>
<P>route add -host 1.2.3.4 -interface xl0 </P><BR>
<P>Or, man route for more details. =0) </P><BR><BR>
<P>
Fer </P><BR><BR><BR>
<P>On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Peter Warrick wrote: </P><BR>
<P>Anyone have any idea what the direct translation of this redhat command
</P>
<P>would be to BSD?? </P><BR>
<P>route add -host 1.2.3.4 dev eth1:0 </P><BR>
<P>eth1:0 is an alias on the eth1 network. eth1:0's IP is 1.2.3.1. What </P>
<P>that command does is say that 1.2.3.4 is directly connected to the </P>
<P>eth1:0 network. This means that it is routing this 1.2.3.4 IP to </P>
<P>1.2.3.1. Even though these addresses seem to be on the same subnet. They
</P>
<P>actually aren't in my configuration. </P><BR>
<P>Thanks for any help.. I've been stuck on getting this to work on my BSD
</P>
<P>box for about a month now. :( </P><BR>
<P>Pete </P><BR>
<P>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org </P>
<P>with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
</P><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C11543.A3168A00--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C18E28011272D41180AD00B0D0496C0801C021E8>