From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 18:14:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F177C16A41F; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 18:14:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Received: from forrie.com (forrie.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.147.45.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F3143D58; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 18:14:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Received: from [192.168.1.99] ([192.168.1.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by forrie.com with ESMTP id j89IE3F7052371; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:14:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Message-ID: <4321D164.5000602@forrie.com> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:16:04 -0400 From: Forrest Aldrich User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050908) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.86.2, clamav-milter version 0.86 on forrie.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: sysctl or system tweak for symbolic links? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:14:05 -0000 Hi, Using FreeBSD_6.0_Beta4 (applies to Beta2, also). I'm trying to track down a problem I've been having with apache-2.0.54 not following symbolic links. It's basically come down to my being able to follow the link if it's in the same directory structure (ie: .. or /path/to/..), but fails if the symbolic link is located elsewhere (ie: /usr/local/path/directory) or on another disk. I wonder if there's a sysctl or other system variable that handles the behavior of or access to symbolic links in this fashion that I may have missed. Seemed like a reasonable conclusion after these tests have been failing, though it could be something else, too. Thanks.