From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 2 19:41:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 269AB3E5 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 19:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from st11p02mm-asmtp001.mac.com (st11p02mm-asmtpout001.mac.com [17.172.220.236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0904989 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 19:41:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fukuyama.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (unknown [73.162.13.215]) by st11p02mm-asmtp001.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.33.0 64bit (built Aug 27 2014)) with ESMTPSA id <0NFZ002DE00B0SB0@st11p02mm-asmtp001.mac.com> for freebsd-arm@freebsd.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 19:41:01 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.13.68,1.0.33,0.0.0000 definitions=2014-12-02_08:2014-12-02,2014-12-02,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1408290000 definitions=main-1412020168 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) Subject: Re: Output of gpioctl From: Rui Paulo In-reply-to: <1417532962961-5970143.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 11:40:58 -0800 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Message-id: References: <1417532962961-5970143.post@n5.nabble.com> To: Scott Ellis X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 19:41:03 -0000 On Dec 2, 2014, at 07:09, Scott Ellis wrote: >=20 > I submitted a bug report for gpioctl. >=20 > = http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Bug-195330-New-Reduce-gpioctl-output-= td5968221.html >=20 > At least I consider it a bug, but I haven't seen any response, so > maybe it is not. >=20 > Is there an example I'm missing where echoing the command line > arguments in gpioctl's output is useful when doing a simple > read or write? >=20 > Seems an unnecessarily awkward 'feature' to workaround when used > in a script or even just viewing the output until you understand > what you are seeing. I think this was some leftover debugging code. I've considered removing = it yesterday when I converted it to use gpio(3). I think it's time to = do it now. Thanks, -- Rui Paulo