From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 25 14:59:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCAFB91B; Mon, 25 May 2015 14:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A72CF6B3; Mon, 25 May 2015 14:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (pool-173-54-116-245.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [173.54.116.245]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BEE8BB913; Mon, 25 May 2015 10:59:50 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Chagin Dmitry Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r283424 - in head/sys: amd64/linux modules/linux64 Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 10:59:48 -0400 Message-ID: <1795461.Fei61WsQ8j@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.1-STABLE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <3590632.VFQBH2fsZP@ralph.baldwin.cx> References: <201505241607.t4OG7C7b073936@svn.freebsd.org> <20150525140421.GA17366@dchagin.static.corbina.net> <3590632.VFQBH2fsZP@ralph.baldwin.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 25 May 2015 10:59:50 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 14:59:51 -0000 On Monday, May 25, 2015 10:40:09 AM John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, May 25, 2015 05:04:21 PM Chagin Dmitry wrote: > That is fine to reuse, but it should probably be explicitly noted in the > comments for that version that it is both for clang 3.6.1 and for x86-64 > Linux support. I imagine the ports tree will know which versions include ^^^^ want to > your changes. -- John Baldwin