From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jul 23 17:54:09 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA28650 for current-outgoing; Tue, 23 Jul 1996 17:54:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mixer.visi.com (nordquis@mixer.visi.com [204.73.178.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA28645 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 1996 17:54:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nordquis@localhost) by mixer.visi.com (8.7.4/8.7.5) id TAA06681; Tue, 23 Jul 1996 19:53:45 -0500 (CDT) From: "Brent J. Nordquist" Posted-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 19:53:45 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199607240053.TAA06681@mixer.visi.com> Subject: Re: cu(1) stopped working? To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 19:53:45 -0500 (CDT) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199607210744.JAA05208@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Jul 21, 96 09:44:56 am Reply-to: nordquis@visi.com (Brent J. Nordquist) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk | > And yes, I have been meaning to switch to tip anyway... looks like | > now is the time. Just wanted everyone to have my one data point on | > this. | | Do you have any reason to switch to tip? I find the Taylor config | files much more intelligible than all the /etc/remote etc. stuff. No, other than the fact the the man page seems to be encouraging me to do so. ;-) I've used cu since the old days... Thanks for the response explaining /etc/uucp from make world... I'll do a little more poking around and see what I turn up. -- Brent J. Nordquist nordquis@winternet.com +1 612 827-2747