From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Feb 23 1:37:14 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2BB037B401 for ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 01:37:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from apollo.laserfence.net (apollo.laserfence.net [196.44.69.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC56543FDF for ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 01:37:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from will@unfoldings.net) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by apollo.laserfence.net with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18msZG-0002TS-00; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:37:06 +0200 Received: from prometheus-p0.datel.laserfence.net ([192.168.255.1] helo=prometheus.home.laserfence.net) by apollo.laserfence.net with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18msZ2-0002T7-00; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:36:54 +0200 Received: from phoenix.home.laserfence.net ([192.168.0.2]) by prometheus.home.laserfence.net with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18msYz-000HwR-00; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:36:49 +0200 Received: from will by phoenix.home.laserfence.net with local (Exim 4.10) id 18msYx-00009a-00; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:36:47 +0200 From: Willie Viljoen To: dick hoogendijk , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: libvorvisfile.la vanished? Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:36:47 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20030223085119.GA7748@nagual.st> <200302231107.01488.will@unfoldings.net> <20030223091658.GA8781@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20030223091658.GA8781@nagual.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200302231136.47622.will@unfoldings.net> X-Spam-Score: (/) X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *18msZ2-0002T7-00*Zy0HDq6GQP6* X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020422 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It depends what you want to do really. If you are upgrading something which has very little dependancies, and on which very little depends, portupgrade will do, but for anything that is so interdependant as KDE, -rR is a must. Will On Sunday 23 February 2003 11:16, dick hoogendijk wrote: > On 23 Feb Willie Viljoen wrote: > > Try portupgrade -rR kdegames :) > > I will.. > Can it be _this_ simple? > > This leads me to another question: > Is there a *right* syntax to use "portupgrade" for most cases? > > I mean: portupgrade is not enough most of the time (?) > Or do I have to use different options in all kind of different > situations? :-(( -- Willie Viljoen Freelance IT Consultant 214 Paul Kruger Avenue, Universitas Bloemfontein 9321 South Africa +27 51 522 15 60 +27 51 522 44 36 (after hours) +27 82 404 03 27 (mobile) will@unfoldings.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message