Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 10:52:18 -0500 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>, toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fast sigblock (AKA rtld speedup) Message-ID: <50ED9232.8020606@mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20130109073841.GH2561@kib.kiev.ua> References: <20130107182235.GA65279@kib.kiev.ua> <50EBAA1F.9070303@freebsd.org> <20130108145631.GD82219@kib.kiev.ua> <50EC34FE.4070804@mu.org> <20130109073841.GH2561@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/9/13 2:38 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:02:22AM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> I think it would be great if it works, I just haven't had time to fully >> understand your more recent patch. If you feel it's safe and maybe do a >> few test programs to see what happens, that would be best. > I revived the test programs I used during the development of the patch, see > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/fast_sigblock.c > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/fast_sigblock2.c > > Also, I adapted the code to the specific case you asked about, in > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/fast_sigblock3.c > When run from the shell, it reports 'Killed'. This looks very good, thank you for addressing my concerns. I think you should go forward with it then. -Alfred
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50ED9232.8020606>