From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jan 22 6:45:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from energyhq.homeip.net (213-97-200-73.uc.nombres.ttd.es [213.97.200.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8235337B402 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:45:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from there (kajsa.energyhq.org [192.168.0.1]) by energyhq.homeip.net (Postfix) with SMTP id BA4643FC20; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:45:28 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Miguel Mendez Organization: Energy HQ To: "Lajos Zaccomer" , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Telnet option negotiation Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:45:02 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: <200201221416.PAA18961@lt.eth.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <200201221416.PAA18961@lt.eth.ericsson.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20020122144528.BA4643FC20@energyhq.homeip.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tuesday 22 January 2002 16:16, Lajos Zaccomer wrote: Hi, > Thanx for the impressive welcome, Terry. Yes, I might be wrong; however, in > this case, please interpret the following quotation from RFC854, page 4: Huh? I didn't see anything wrong in Terry's answer. > Might be you who don't understand? If I was wrong, how is that all other > platforms supported the way I used, except FreeBSD? Fuzzy, isn't it? Please go use Linux. Sorry, couldn't resist :) -- Miguel Mendez - flynn@energyhq.homeip.net EnergyHQ :: http://energyhq.homeip.net FreeBSD - The power to serve! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message