From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Nov 24  9:48:15 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A100614F80; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 09:48:02 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA13769;
	Wed, 24 Nov 1999 10:46:16 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA21366; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 10:46:40 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <199911241746.KAA21366@harmony.village.org>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Subject: Re: ps on 4.0-current 
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 24 Nov 1999 18:29:30 +0100."
		<35709.943464570@critter.freebsd.dk> 
References: <35709.943464570@critter.freebsd.dk>  
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 10:46:40 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

In message <35709.943464570@critter.freebsd.dk> Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
: So please explain the logic you want implemented once people have
: stopped haggeling about it, it is rather trivial.

OK.  I'll likely state what I'd like to see as a patch.

: I pressume we want the same policy for /proc/*/cmdline as for the
: sysctl ps(1) uses ?

Yes.  I'll firm this up later today and send an exact proposal out so
we can kill this.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message