From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jul  8 09:31:33 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F6D1065678;
	Sun,  8 Jul 2012 09:31:33 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E8D8FC1C;
	Sun,  8 Jul 2012 09:31:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q689VLBX002039;
	Sun, 8 Jul 2012 11:31:21 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q689VL9u002036; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 11:31:21 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 11:31:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FF952FB.10200@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207081130540.2035@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <CA+QLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<89AB703D-E075-4AAC-AC1B-B358CC4E4E7F@lists.zabbadoz.net>
	<4FF8C3A1.9080805@FreeBSD.org>
	<0AFE3C4A-22DB-4134-949F-4D05BBFC4C6C@lists.zabbadoz.net>
	<4FF8CA35.7040209@FreeBSD.org>
	<CA+tpaK1R1miXTJv8YJUMZWQcKFk7RPDePDBiCEMdWHZX=qksSQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FF952FB.10200@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Sun, 08 Jul 2012 11:31:22 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 12:40:22 +0000
Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>,
	=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>,
	FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>,
	"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
Subject: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before
 9.1 code freeze?)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 09:31:33 -0000

> line with ours. So in the short term (as in, the next few years) we're
> better off with unbound in the base.
>
> The ideal, long-term solution is to re-think what "The Base" is, and
> give users more flexibility at install time. Unfortunately, there is a

making base as minimal as possible give you exactly that!

> knee-jerk "zomg, we don't want to be like linux!" reaction to that idea
it is proper reaction.