From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 13 15:43:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3B116A4CE for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:43:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from thuis.piwebs.com (217-19-20-186.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.20.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C169B43F3F for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:43:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from avleeuwen@piwebs.com) Received: (qmail 80533 invoked by uid 85); 13 Nov 2003 23:46:22 -0000 Received: from avleeuwen@piwebs.com by thuis.piwebs.com by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.20rc1 (uvscan: v4.2.40/v4288. Clear:RC:1:. Processed in 1.155958 secs); 13 Nov 2003 23:46:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.0.110) (192.168.0.110) by 0 with SMTP; 13 Nov 2003 23:46:20 -0000 From: Arjan van Leeuwen To: Jeff Roberson , Harald Schmalzbauer Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 00:43:41 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20031113162411.H10222-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> In-Reply-To: <20031113162411.H10222-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_tcBt/Lsiv/yCC/d"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200311140043.41631.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE and very bad responsiveness X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 23:43:46 -0000 --Boundary-02=_tcBt/Lsiv/yCC/d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 13 November 2003 22:25, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > On Thursday 13 November 2003 07:17, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > from comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc: > > > > > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > On 2003-11-13, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > > >> Well, I don't have any measurements but in my case it's not > > > >> neccessary at all. I built a UP kernel with ULE like Kris advised > > > >> me. > > > > > > > > Are you running an up-to-date 5.1-CURRENT? ULE was broken with the= se > > > > characteristics until very recently. If you're up-to-date and still > > > > see these problems, you need to post to the current mailing list. > > > > > > > > Kris > > > > > > Yes, I am running current as of 13. Nov. > > > > > > Find attached my first problem description. > > > > This time I also attached my dmesg and kernel conf > > Try running seti with nice +20 rather than 15. Do you experience bad > interactivity without seti running? On a related note, when will SCHED_ULE become the default? It looks like it= 's=20 ready now (I just played Quake 3 while compiling a new X server :)). This=20 should speed up the finding of any bugs in SCHED_ULE. Best regards, Arjan --Boundary-02=_tcBt/Lsiv/yCC/d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/tBct3Ym57eNCXiERAkGtAJ48WRkpuza508/qZtWhZvgI8BQRYACfbHUh s94ga2n05J42QW60hXg5SQI= =6JO+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_tcBt/Lsiv/yCC/d--