From owner-freebsd-current Mon Dec 20 7:44: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from penelope.skunk.org (penelope.skunk.org [208.133.204.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8D0150DC for ; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 07:43:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ben@penelope.skunk.org) Received: from localhost (ben@localhost) by penelope.skunk.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA28248; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 10:53:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 10:53:55 -0500 (EST) From: Ben Rosengart To: Fritz Heinrichmeyer Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: current for production? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 20 Dec 1999, Fritz Heinrichmeyer wrote: > as there now is almost only talk about sound and ata drivers in this > list, would it be adviseable to use a current-snap on a server machine > (apache,samba,ftp) without need for sound and ata drivers (box with > aic-scsi-only drives)? > > The integrated gcc-2.95.2 is so handy and current does all i want on my > private box anyway. I think you'd have better luck asking people what their experiences with the software have been, rather than asking for a recommendation. No one is likely to want to take the responsibility of recommending -current for a production site, but they'll be happy to share their own experiences and let you come to your own conclusion. -- Ben Rosengart UNIX Systems Engineer, Skunk Group StarMedia Network, Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message