From owner-freebsd-current  Tue May  6 03:07:51 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA02162
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 6 May 1997 03:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.2.144.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA02157;
          Tue, 6 May 1997 03:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from danny@localhost) by panda.hilink.com.au (8.8.5/8.7.3) id UAA23949; Tue, 6 May 1997 20:10:41 +1000 (EST)
Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 20:10:40 +1000 (EST)
From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au>
To: Michael Reifenberger <root@totum.plaut.de>
cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: divert still broken?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970506112726.15899A-100000@totum.plaut.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970506201004.4479n-100000@panda.hilink.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



On Tue, 6 May 1997, Michael Reifenberger wrote:

> > > So the choices are:
> > >   deny  :  be silent
> > >   reject:  send ICMP !H
> > >   reset :  send RST
> > 
> > Sounds OK with me.. any body else care to comment?
> 
> In this case wouldn't match the keyword drop better than deny? 

Maybe.  But it is better to keep the backward compatibility.

Danny