Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 29 Oct 2005 23:21:48 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf DEFAULTS GENERIC
Message-ID:  <20051030062148.GA76667@dragon.NUXI.org>
In-Reply-To: <200510271734.j9RHYZAk015054@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <200510271734.j9RHYZAk015054@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 05:34:35PM +0000, John Baldwin wrote:
> jhb         2005-10-27 17:34:35 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD src repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     sys/i386/conf        GENERIC 
>   Added files:
>     sys/i386/conf        DEFAULTS 
>   Log:
>   Create a default kernel config for i386 and move 'device isa' and
>   'device npx' (both of which aren't really optional right now) and
>   'device io' and 'device mem' (to preserve POLA for 4.x users upgrading
>   to 6.0) from GENERIC into DEFAULTS.

I may be missing something.  I don't quite follow the benefit of the new
'DEFAULTS' file.  I'm also curious why we don't explicitly 'include'
DEFAULTS in GENERIC vs. the new automagic include feature.

I wonder if someone might trip over this not realizing everything that
winds up in their config file.  I for one have been using io.ko and
mem.ko after coping GENERIC to FOO and removing the 'io' and 'mem'
devices.
 
-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051030062148.GA76667>