Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:39:09 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> Cc: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>, Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors Message-ID: <20081213213835.V44622@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <18756.6041.574155.725937@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <20081213143200.GA5026@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <18755.53118.854987.966113@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20081213182336.V41178@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <87skosf02b.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20081213184751.N41297@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <18756.6041.574155.725937@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Except Flash support depends (/inter alia/) on the Linux > emulation layer, which has been accepted as part of the "FreeBSD > developers" job. Indeed, I get the feeling Flash is sort of a quiet flash runs under linux emulation with linux binary browsers. what a problem?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081213213835.V44622>