From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 25 01:02:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E775416A4CE for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 01:02:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA8B43D2D for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 01:02:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 216A7531E2; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:02:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:02:42 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mike Tancsa Message-ID: <20050425010242.GA44110@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050424175543.71041.qmail@web51805.mail.yahoo.com> <20050424151517.O68772@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <3822.216.177.243.38.1114385370.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <20050425000459.GA28667@xor.obsecurity.org> <6.2.1.2.0.20050424204611.072105a0@64.7.153.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.0.20050424204611.072105a0@64.7.153.2> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 is coming too fast X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 01:02:50 -0000 --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 08:54:00PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 08:04 PM 24/04/2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > >> Performance in other areas seems to be lagging as well. > > > >Since you were wrong about the above, I have to ask whether you have > >evidence of this. >=20 > There was a lengthy discussion along with bonnie, dd, postmark and iozone= =20 > results discussed in January on the freebsd-performance list that=20 > illustrate the disk io difference between RELENG_4 and RELENG_5 at the ti= me. >=20 > I also tried a CURRENT snapshot then and there wasn't much of a differenc= e=20 > between it and RELENG_5. disk I/O or filesystem I/O? It would be interesting to benchmark the latter since all the recent VFS work. Kris --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCbEGxWry0BWjoQKURAropAKCHnQBq4McxN6HwWsmSRaFdvW2u1gCfZjSL yvDLA6Ov8aB/8KinY5PSz8g= =hYKy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--