From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Jul 13 09:29:55 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA26414 for isp-outgoing; Sun, 13 Jul 1997 09:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orion.denverweb.net (root@sdn-ts-001coauroP15.dialsprint.net [206.133.160.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA26400 for ; Sun, 13 Jul 1997 09:29:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orion (blaine@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.denverweb.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA04471; Sun, 13 Jul 1997 09:24:42 -0600 Message-ID: <33C8F339.66F27147@denverweb.net> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 09:24:41 -0600 From: Blaine Minazzi Organization: What, me organized? X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; Linux 2.0.27 i486) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dennis CC: isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: T1/T3 Upgrade Options? References: <3.0.32.19970713121221.007320c8@etinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Dennis wrote: > I dont think that throughput will be an issue with a properly designed card, > and also don't fall into the assumption that Cisco T3 routers are as reliable > as 2501s with a T1. You still may be able to easily justfy using a $5000. > box...the maintenance contract alone an a high-end cisco will cost you more > than keeping a crony on call 24X7 and a complete spare to "boot" :-) > > Now multiple T3s is another banana altogether.... > > Dennis Of course, if you have a T-3, you most likely have at least someone on a pager 24X7... ( Glad It's not me anymore. I hated the pager duty when I was a gub'mint contractor. ) May we all have the bannanas to deal with in the future. :-) Blaine