From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 15:49:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1834616A406 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from blyon@util2.sjc1.bitgravity.com) Received: from util2.sjc1.bitgravity.com (util2.sjc1.bitgravity.com [208.67.233.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FCD13C471 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from blyon@util2.sjc1.bitgravity.com) Received: from c-69-181-166-240.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([69.181.166.240] helo=[192.168.1.197]) by util2.sjc1.bitgravity.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HMn1h-0002Ej-Uk; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 07:17:01 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20070224215508.GA41968@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E13410.7020505@he.iki.fi> <20070225071946.GA48242@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E14BAD.80909@he.iki.fi> <20070225084737.GA49231@xor.obsecurity.org> <5a0a9d6f0702260936u3408f8d8rd4cde9234b2f7776@mail.gmail.com> <45E54619.7000503@isc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Barrett Lyon Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 07:16:29 -0800 To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Sender: blyon@util2.sjc1.bitgravity.com Cc: Kip Macy , Peter Losher Subject: Re: UDP performance. X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:49:00 -0000 I also have a few 10GbE interfaces and Ixia chassis that I can run tests with if someone wants to send me a spec. -Barrett Barrett Lyon email/sip/iax: blyon@blyon.com cell: +1.916.387.8649 On Mar 1, 2007, at 1:28 AM, Kip Macy wrote: >> We recently put a stock Fedora Core 6 and a stock FreeBSD 6.2 on the >> same HW (HP ProLiant DL320 G5 Dual Core Xeons w/ 16GB RAM) and >> running >> BIND 9.4.0 and a well known ccTLD zone that we slammed a query stream >> to. On a single threaded BIND, there was a 20% advantage to >> Linux, on a >> multi threaded build, Linux trounced FreeBSD (39k to 89k queries/sec) >> >> There's also been other analysis done by Marcelo Amarai @ Registro.br >> that was posted to freebsd-net back last September. >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-September/ >> 011748.html> > > I have a couple of dual Woodcrests running back-to-back over multiple > 10GigE cards that I'd like to do performance testing with. Did you use > the same testing methodology as Marcelo? If not can you go into more > detail on your setup and how to reproduce? > > -Kip > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org"